Thursday, August 29, 2013

Tidbits of Philology no. 4




Welcome to this week's ToP. Today we will talk about Translation:

In his book Sur la Traduction (2004), Paul Ricoeur discusses what he calls the "impossible relationship" between different languages. Contrary to what common sense may imply, however, every single aspect of every language in the world may be translated, in one way or another, even if the translator needs a whole page to translate a single word (the American translator of Grande Sertão: Veredas, a masterpiece of Brazilian Literature written by Guimarãens Rosa, wrote a 10-page long Preface about the concept of "sertão").

However, there are instances in which the translator has to stop for (quite) a while and do a brainstorming in order to find an acceptable solution for a given "translation trap". Many authors call these traps "Untranslatabilities".

I usually categorize untranslatabilities as such:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Untranslatabilities

1. Linguistic
1.1. Syntactic
1.2. Lexical
1.3. Phonetic

2. Cultural

3. Circumstantial
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let's see some examples:


1. Linguistic Untranslatability

1.1. Syntactic
"Make poverty history."
In order to translate this, especially to a non-Germanic language, the translator would have to restructure the word order, adding connectives. In Brazilian Portuguese, for instance, a translation option would be "Faça da pobreza uma coisa do passado."

1.2. Lexical
Every language has certain words that express idiosyncratic meanings, many of which may be found only in one given language.

"My mother moonlights as a nurse."
English is a particularly good language for lexical untranslatabilities because, in theory, every noun may be turned into a verb without any morphological marks.

1.3. Phonetic
This is the main problem a translator faces when translating classic poetry, because not only the meanings must be kept, but also the music/rhymes/rhythm of the text.

Observe this dialogue between a little girl and her father:

Little girl: "Let's see Bambi!"
Father: "No, dear."
Little girl: "Come one!"
Father: "I said no deer!"

2. Cultural Untranslatability

As language is an inseparable part of a community's culture, it always has a way of expressing cultural elements that are specific to that community.

In many Germanic languages, when you say "My family has come to the party.", you mean "father, mother, sister and brother". When you say the same thing in Brazilian Portuguese, it may imply that you've brought your father, mother, sister, brother, uncles and aunts, cousins, in-laws and perhaps the family dog, cat and parrot.

In some countries, families throw a party when their girl turns 16, the so-called "Sweet Sixteen". In many other countries, this is done when the girl turns 15.

In Brazil, a famous brand of household appliances, Brastemp, has become a synonym for "a high-quality product", although its usage has become somewhat obsolete nowadays. Thus, Brazilians might say "Comprei um carro novo. Não é uma Brastemp, mas quebra o galho." ("I've just bought a new car. It's not a Brastemp, but it works.")

3. Circumstantial Untranslatability

This is perhaps the hardest of all types of translation traps, because it has to do with the circumstance in which the speech act or text was uttered/written.

In an episode of "That 70's Show", there is a scene in which we see a mechanic workshop with a sign that says "Trade your used muffler". Then, a group of teenagers show up and one of them sprays the letters "LER", covering them in black graffiti. Now, how would you reconstruct this situation in another language?

Another classic example is "There is no I in team".

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It is certainly not easy to be a translator. Apart from the usual intrinsic difficulties to correctly use translation procedures, due to obvious discrepancies between the two linguistic systems, they are also faced with such frigging traps.

If you have additional examples of any of these untranslatabilities, I'd be glad to know.

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Religious Symbolism in Language



Those who know me also know I am not a religious person. Normally I don't mind being told "God bless you" and respond with a somewhat shy "thank you", just to be nice, but some expressions in some languages make me relatively uncomfortable. In Southern Germany, "Grüß Gott!" ("Greet God!") is a very common greeting. I don't live in Southern Germany, but I simply cannot picture myself saying that.

I have always avoided expressions with obviously religious connotations like "Thank God!" and "God willing!", while I don't have much of a problem with originally religious expressions that have diachronically lost their primary meaning, such as "Good-bye!" ("God be with ye!") and "Adieu!" ("To God [I bestow your destiny]!").

The ones I have problem with are those expressions with obviously religious connotations in languages that have no alternatives whatsoever. If I want to avoid saying "God bless you!", what should I say to an English-speaking someone who has just sneezed? In Persian, what should I say while departing if I don't wanna say "خداحافظ" ("Chodā hāfez", "May God be your guardian!")?

Other examples include:

Icelandic: Bless! (Good-bye)
Arabic world: In sha Allah! (God willing)
Portuguese: Nossa mãe do céu! (Interjection that expresses surprise or fear, "Our mother in heaven!")
Greek: Θεέ μου! (Oh, my God!)

Language and culture are permanently intertwined, and religion is a (very important) part of many cultures around the world. As some parts of the world become less religious, their languages slowly part from more obviously religious connotations, while such expressions are emphasized in parts of the world that gradually become more religious/fundamentalist.

What is your take on this? Are you religious? Do you deliberately use expressions containing religious connotations?

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Tidbits of Philology no. 3

Borrowing

Every language in the world has borrowed, at some point in time, words from other languages. This is by the way how a new language is formed. Apart from our original language (if such a language ever existed), all other languages are made of borrowed and adapted words, structures and sounds.

There are basically four ways a word can be borrowed:


1. Loanword with morphological accommodationfootball > futebol (Port.)


2. Loanword without accommodationfeedback > feedback (Port.)


3. Loan blendDies Saturni > Saturday (Eng.) The God "Saturn" comes from Latin + Germanic root "day"


4. Loan shift (calque and semantic extension)
Calque - football > ποδόσφαιρο (Greek) podos (foot) + sfero (sphere)


Semantic extension - mouse > souris (French) The word in French had one meaning before the borrowing, now it has two.


Haugen (1950) The Analysis of Linguistic Borrowing


The "most borrowed" word class is nouns, followed by adjectives and verbs. Each language/country has specific rules for borrowed words. In Portuguese, for instance, all borrowed verbs must end in -ar (1st conjugation). Some languages prefer loanwords with accommodation, others prefer loan shifts.


How do you say the following nouns and verbs in your languages?


NOUNS1. computer2. monitor3. screen4. mouse5. keyboard6. folder7. file8. mobile phone9. touchscreen10. e-mail


VERBS1. download2. upload3. e-mail4. print5. click6. save7. log in8. scan9. post (on Facebook)10. share

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Is ability a situational possibility?



While trying to establish a logical typology of modal meanings, I came across the problem of categorizing ability under situational possibility. Many authors group ability under dynamic modality, as it does not involve (or, at least, not more than tangentially) moral obligations, desirability or interdiction.

Dryer et al. (2011), however, state that “Both permission and ability have to do with a notion of possibility” (DRYER, 2011: Chapter 74). I’ll try to defend their point of view with some modal logic below.

(1) I can drive you to work.


Sentence (1) clearly denotes both ability and possibility, and may be understood as follows:

∃x (I (x) ∧ ♢Drive (x) ∧ ♢Drive (x,you) ⟷ ♢Drive (x) )
∃x (I (x) ⋀ ¬♢Drive (x) ➞ ¬♢Drive (x,you) )


The first possibility is the ability itself; the second, the actual possibility to drive you; the result is that the ability is a pre-requisite for the possibility to drive you.

This seems clear enough, the real problem is when there’s no apparent situational possibility, as in


(2) I can speak English.


However, this sentence can be understood as follows:


∃x (I (x) ∧ ♢Speak (x) ∧ ♢Speak (x,english) ➞ ♢Speak (x,english) ↔ ♢Speak (x,english) )
∃x ( I (x) ⋀ ¬♢Speak (x) ➞ ¬♢Speak (x,english) )
∃x ( I (x) ⋀ ¬♢Speak (x,english) ➞ ¬♢Speak (x,english) )

The possibility itself can be understood to be linked to the inherent ability which may or may not be utilized by the agent. In other words, if the possibility exists that I speak German with anyone, then the possibility exists that I speak German to someone because I am able to speak German. Following this interpretation, I can state that every dynamic modality that expresses ability also expresses a situational possibility, given the time and chance.

Therefore, I can conclude that dynamic modality expressing ability may also be grouped under situational possibility, together with

  1. Possibility: You can take bus number 25 to the main station.
  2. Permission: You may leave now. and
  3. Request: May I leave now?

Reference: 

DRYER, Matthew S. & HASPELMATH, Martin (eds.), (2011) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Available at http://wals.info/
Acessed on July 6th, 2013

Tidbits of Philology no. 2


Welcome to Tidbits of Philology no. 2!

This time I will not spill the beans and will let you contribute with the corresponding structure in your language!

Today’s topic is the theme of my current research - Modality.

In a nutshell, Modality is a remarkable characteristic of human languages to talk about possible worlds, i.e., alternative realities that might not necessarily exist:

I wish I could buy a new car.
I wish she would call me.
I wonder how life would be if I were rich.

There is a lot of conflicting work on the taxonomy of modal meanings. This is, however, a very rough summary:

  1. Epistemic - requires some degree of knowledge (or guessing!) and is object-oriented:

She should be home by now.
The lights are on, she must be home.

  1. Root - does not presupose any knowledge (epistémi) and is subject-oriented.

2.1. Deontic - expresses obligation and permission:

I must go now.
May I leave now?

2.2. Dynamic - expresses ability and will.

2.2.1. Ability

I can speak German.

2.2.2. Volition

I want to leave now.

----
OK, let’s focus today on “ability” and “permission”. There are many studies on Germanic languages which prove that the modal verb “may” can now be used with overlapping meanings of “ability” and “permission”:

You may go now. = You can go now.

In fact, “can” is, according to corpora-based studies, much more productive (i.e., used more often) than “may”.

This seems to be true in German as well:

Du darfst gehen. = Du kannst gehen.
----
In order to express ability, English uses “can” in the present, “could” in the past and “be able to” in the future:

I can speak German.
I could speak German when I was a child.
I will be able to speak German when I finish the German course.

Modal auxiliaries are a common feature in all Germanic languages and have very similar structures: [modal] + [verb in the infinitive], although German and Dutch use SOV in such cases, while English and Swedish keep the SVO syntax:

I can speak German.
Jag kan tala tyska.

Ik kan Duits spreken.
Ich kann deutsch sprechen.

Icelandic uses the past participle (að tala > talað) following the modal auxiliary!

Jég geta talað þýsku.

----

The Romance languages, however, don’t have special modal verbs, and use regular, fully-conjugated verbs instead (some authors call them “semi-modals”):

Eu sei falar alemão.

Another possibility is to delete the semi-modal and use the main verb only:

Eu falo alemão. (This alternative is true for English and many Germanic languages as well).

This seems to work with some verbs, but not with others:

Ela sabe nadar. (She can swim)
Ela nada. (She swims = she is a professional swimmer > not a modal meaning)

----

More languages will be added soon!

See y'all soon,
Rafael

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Rafael Lanzetti's Tidbits of Philology no. 001


Hello everyone, welcome to the first “Lanzetti’s Tidbits of Philology”. In this series, I’ll present you tiny bits of previous research, class material and examples for papers/lectures I’ve prepared throughout the years I’ve been working as a University Linguistics teacher. These will be brief and direct, but you can ask me for more detailed info if you wish. I’ll always give examples in the languages I know or learn, and I’d be grateful if you could add the corresponding translation in your own language.

Today’s topic is the idiom “to know by heart” - 

The English expression itself comes from Latin “ex corde” (cf. SPQR) through French, probably adopted in England in the 12th century C.E. together with about 12,000 other lexemes.

Then we have two main philological groups: 

Group 1: Languages that continue using the Latin reference to the heart, especially the “romantic” Romance languages

Portuguese “de cor”
French “par cœur”

Subgroup 1.1: Languages that refer to other parts of the body

Dutch “uit het hoofd” (from the head)
Hebrew: “בעל פה” (from the mouth, orally)
Bulgarian: наизуст (from the mouth)

Subgroup 1.2: Languages that refer to the abstract concept of “memory”

Spanish: “de memoria”
Italian: “a memoria”

Group 2: Languages that refer to the location/motion “out”. The probable etymological explanation here is that one knows the piece of information s/he wants to give without needing any extra help from a book, s/he can “expel it”, “warble it out” from the inside of his/her head outwards to the real world. According to the Duden Dictionary, the idiom was created around the 13th century and its meaning was already widespread around the 16th century in Germany. Many of the main Germanic languages use this reference, although some of them have switched the origin-destination relation, but that is a very common philological phenomenon.

German: “auswendig” (moving outwards)
Dutch: “van buiten” (from the outside)
Swedish: “utantill” (outwards)
Icelandic: “utan að” (outwards)
Romanian: “pe dinafară” (on the outside)
Greek: “απ’έξω” (from the outside)

I’d be interested in knowing to which of the groups your language belongs!

Monday, June 24, 2013

Η ΩΡΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΙΑΜΑΡΤΥΡΙΩΝ


Οι τελευταίες διαμαρτυρίες στην Βραζιλία είναι μια απόδεξη πως οι λαοί του κόσμου  είναι κουρασμένοι, δυστυχισμένοι και απογοητευμένοι με τα πρότυπα διακυβέρνησης των χωρών τους. Η διαφθορά και η προστασία των συμφερόντων των πολιτικών είναι μια αρρώστια που έχει διαποτίσεί σχεδόν όλες τις χώρες του δυτικού κόσμου.

Κατά τη διάρκεια τεσσάρων δεκαετίων οι Βραζιλιάνοι έχουν ανεχτεί μια απίστευτη ποσότητα αδικιών, αναίδειας και αδιαφορίας. Τελικά τώρα ξύπνησε ο λαός, μόνο μετά τις διαμαρτυρίες στην Ελλάδα και στην Τουρκία. Αυτό είναι το αποτέλεσμα όταν η κοινωνία είναι υποχρεωμένη να υπακούει γελοίους, απίστευτους νόμους που έχουν δημιουργηθεί μόνο για να ωφελήσουν τους ανθρώπους που τους πέρασαν.

Αυτά είναι δύο από τα προγράμματα που πέρασαν οι πολιτικοί μας:

  1. Οι πολιτικοί στην Βραζιλία παίρνουν δεκαπέντε μισθούς τον χρόνο. Οι αποδοχές τους, επί την ευκαιρία, είναι γύρω στις οχτώ χιλιάδες ευρώ τον μήνα, καθώς ο ελάχιστος μισθός είναι γύρω στα εξακόσια ευρώ.
  2. Επιπλέον, κάθε Βραζιλιάνικος πολιτικός παίρνει περισσότερα από έξι χιλιάδες ευρώ τον μήνα για να καλύψουν τα έξοδά του σε πτήσεις και βενζίνη, δύο χιλιάδες ευρώ για το ενοίκιό του, χίλια ευρώ για τα έξοδά του σε τηλεφωνήματα, και απίστευτες είκοσι εφτά χιλιάδες ευρώ για να πληρώσει μέχρι τριάντα γραμματείς στο γραφείο του. Φυσικά προσλαμβάνουν φίλους και συγγενείς τους σε άχρηστες θέσεις.

Αυτή η απόλυτη αδιαφορία για τους ψηφοφόρους τους έχει σαν αποτέλεσμα μια αξιοθρήνητη κατάσταση στην υγεία, στην εκπαίδευση και στην ασφάλεια του πληθυσμού. Είναι φαινομενικό να βρίσκουμε νοσοκομεία που μοιάζουν με εμπόλεμες ζώνες, γεμάτα από ασθενείς που ξαπλώνουν στο πάτωμα, γιατί δεν έχουν αρκετά φορεία.

Μια χώρα πού οι πολιτικοί παίρνουν οχτώ χιλιάδες ευρώ τον μήνα και οι δάσκαλοι των γυμνάσιων διακόσια πενήντα ευρώ δεν μπορεί να είναι ούτε μια σοβαρή ούτε μια αξιοπρεπής χώρα.

Παρ’όλα αυτά, η κυβέρνηση έχει τελειώσει το χτίσιμο του ακριβότερου στάδιου ποδοσφαίρου του κόσμου, το στάδιο Mané Garrincha στην πόλη Βραζίλια, για πεντακόσια χιλιάδες ευρώ, ακριβώς σε μια πόλη που δεν έχει καμιά ομάδα ποδοσφαίρου, καμιά παράδοση στο σπορ.

Αυτή είναι η ώρα των διαμαρτυριών - η αλλαγή μπορεί να έρθει μόνο όταν η κυβέρνηση αρχίσει να φοβάται το λαό. Όταν ήμουν μικρός, η γενιά των γονών μου κατάφερε να καταργήσει μια δικτατορία. Έπειτα “κοιμήθηκε” ο λαός για πάρα πολύ καιρό. Αυτή είναι η ευκαιρία που έχουμε πάλι να κάνουμε ό,τι δεν έκανε ακόμα η γενιά μου - να αλλάξουμε τη χώρα.